Real IT with Enterprise 2.0

Convergance of SOA, BPM, EAI and Web 2.0

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Enterprise Web 2.0 for the CIO

Posted by precopio on January 26, 2007

Business Will Depend on EW2.0 – What you need to know today to survive tomorrow

Today, users, customer and employees expect to get information from anywhere and to work from everywhere in the world. From everywhere, they want everything. This means applications and services must be available in as many places as possible. If you doubt this, take a look at the exploding interest in Web 2.0, Office 2.0, Enterprise 2.0 and Enterprise Web 2.0. These 2.0’s are real and will drive how organizations communicate with customers and business partners now and in the future. For many companies, these 2.0 technologies will determine whether they are in business in five years.

In all the years of IT, we’ve never experienced such rapid growth in technologies and user needs that we have today. 2.0 technologies are revolutionizing business and IT. The word “revolution” may seem a bit harsh. However, if you look at Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) and Business Process Management (BPM) as evolutionary, than 2.0 is revolutionary.

Let’s take a look at SOA and BPM for a moment. Most companies have just begun to evolve and implement SOA and BPM. Even with evolutionary technologies such as SOA and BPM, there is a ton of conflicting evidence and analyst rhetoric about whether they will help companies succeed. For this reason, the decisions companies make today regarding SOA, BPM and 2.0 will either help or hinder their ability to compete and survive in the next few years.

 

EW2.0 is more than delivering web applications and providing portals for collaboration. EW2.0 is made up of three areas. Each of these areas is important to the success and level of acceptance of EW2.0. The three areas are:

  1. Applications and application integration
  2. Connectivity (Internet, wireless, network)
  3. End-point technologies such as PDA’s and laptops

EW2.0, Applications and Application Integration
This includes portal, wiki, mash-ups and web technologies that companies need to understand and implement. There is a huge difference between web applications such as salesforce.com and web services applications such as eBay. Web applications are easy to manage and deliver. However, most applications can not be delivered as web applications. Legacy applications and databases need to be exposed as web services (SOA). These web services need to be orchestrated (BPM) into a composite (portal) application that can be delivered via the web. For this reason, companies need a solid yet flexibly infrastructure of applications and integration that provide a foundation for EW2.0.

EAI, SOA, BPM

Tools

Web 2.0 companies – too many to list (another thing to write about)

EW2.0 – Connectivity
Users today are demanding access to information anywhere, anytime. These demands will only increase in the future. What will our 15 year olds, who use portals such as Myspace and Google expect when they enter the workforce? They will expect “always-on” technologies and solutions. IT departments need to know and implement the correct connection and network access to be successful with EW2.0. This includes technologies and security issues and solutions.

Data Connectivity and Infrastructure

Feeds - Too many to list

Wireless:

 

EW2.0 – End-User Devices
The third area of EW2.0 is end-user technologies and devices. These access devices provide the vehicle for employees, customers and partners to access information and applications from anywhere in the world. How companies utilize and standardize on these technologies is critical to their success. Companies need a framework making decisions on what types of devises are best for different organizations.

Roadblock – People
Even after understanding how the three areas of EW2.0 will improve or hinder adoption of EW2.0, there are other challenges that are important to consider. Changing how people work is a big roadblock to the adoption of any technology. Individuals such as customers and employees will always revert to the standard way of operating. Companies need to understand acceptance levels of users and management before embarking on the transformation to EW2.0.

What You Need to Know
There is an enormous difference between a web application such as Salesforce.com and a web service portal application. Companies need to decide when to build applications and when to purchase external web applications. Companies need a framework to help define organizational goals pertaining to EW2.0. With these goals, companies can list and prioritize applications. Then based on their understanding of the three main areas of EW2.0, companies can make informed decisions on whether to purchase or build, who can access, and how applications will be delivered.

 

 

Posted in Andrew McAfee, BPM, Blogroll, Enterprise 2.0, Enterprise Web 2.0, Office 2.0, Precopio, SOA, Web 2.0 | 5 Comments »

Web 2.0 Solution Platforms – Part 3

Posted by precopio on December 11, 2006

Business Value of Solution Platforms

By shifting from building solutions to building solution platforms, companies will increase revenue, reduce infrastructure costs and improve customer satisfaction.

First, solution platforms increase revenue by making services and products easier to purchase, shorten sales cycles and provide up-sell opportunities. For example, many analysts predict music software and online retailers such as Apple’s iTunes will replace music retailers. Companies such as Apple and Yahoo created platforms where customers can research (play sample music), collaborate (music ratings), self-assemble (purchase one song at a time) and consume (download to multiple formats). All of these features shorten the sales cycle because it is easier for consumers to access and evaluate music.

Second, solution platforms reduce infrastructure costs by moving purchasing to online resources and allow vendors to easily measure and discontinue products that do not generate revenue. Businesses in every sector and market report that online sales increase year over year. For most organizations, web or e-commerce sales are much less expensive than retailer or direct sales. Now, these same companies are using new technologies such as web 2.0 and Ajax to help increase revenue. In addition to moving to the web, companies who use solution platforms get direct and instant feedback on what services and products are important to their customers. This allows companies to make faster and better decisions on what products will help build the bottom line.

Third, customers who purchase products or services through solution platforms are more satisfied. Solution platforms provide an environment where consumers can use or demo products such as the iTunes example, research and compare competing products on eBay, and collaborate with other consumers through Instant Messaging (IM) or product and vendor ratings. This additional information reassures consumers that they made the right purchase decision based on their needs which increases their satisfaction.

Conclusion

Companies that understand and embrace solution platforms will be better positioned for future success and even survival because solution platforms are based on user’s needs and wants. Current users have extremely high expectations and their expectations continue to grow. Companies who embrace solution platforms will recognize the real and tangible benefits such as increased revenue, reduced infrastructure and improved customer service.

Posted in BPM, Blogroll, Enterprise 2.0, Enterprise Web 2.0, Office 2.0, Precopio, SOA, Web 2.0 | 3 Comments »

Web 2.0 – Solution Platforms Part Two

Posted by precopio on December 7, 2006

Part Two

Examples of Solution Platforms

Wireless cellular plans provide an easy to understand example of solution platforms. Since cellular telephones were introduced, carriers offered limited, prepackaged plans. These plans were solutions, rather than products, and were designed to answer customer needs. A plan consisted of talking minutes, roaming charges and other features. Every customer had their choice of plans that suited their needs. Today, many wireless carriers offer customized plans where the customer selects the services and features they want and need. This type of offering comes from the concept of customer built or self-assembled solutions. The carriers who embrace this type of buying behavior have a clear advantage now and in the future.

eBay and Salesforce.com also provide customers with an easy way to self-assemble solutions that best fit their requirements. These innovative companies created solution platforms that allow customers to construct business processes based on a standard set of reusable services. eBay’s solution platform provides individuals and vendors with the tools necessary to list, price and sell their products and services. Salesforce.com’s platform offers clients a laundry list of services that help companies’ mange customers from lead creation to ongoing account management.

The Need for Solution Platforms

In the current IT environment, users, customers and employees are not bound to the office or a dial up connection. They want to access information from everywhere and demand to work from anywhere. This means applications and services must be available in as many locations as possible. If you doubt this, look at the exploding interest in Web 2.0, Office 2.0, Enterprise 2.0 and Enterprise Web 2.0. All of these concepts provide users with a solutions platform that enables them to develop customized solutions that can be accessed from any location. Solution platforms are about usability and availability. The latest hype revolves around the category of content including video and audio. However the manner in which end-users access and use content is more important than the actual content. For instance, take a look at Google’s latest acquisition. Google recently purchased YouTube for over $1 billion. Is a company that provides on-line video worth that much money? The answer is no. Google’s interest in this video company lies in YouTube’s self-assembly platform and video on-demand system. The important part of this acquisition is not about what content this company provides, it is about the way people access and use this content. In other words, it is a solutions platform that allows end-users to gather data, collaborate with other users and purchase or distribute content in an easy to use method.

Next in Part Three – Business Value of Solution Platforms

Posted in BPM, Blogroll, Enterprise 2.0, Enterprise Web 2.0, Office 2.0, Precopio, SOA, Web 2.0 | Leave a Comment »

Agility – SOA, BPM, BAM = Enterprise 2.0

Posted by precopio on October 31, 2006

As I awoke and walked to the door to get my complimentary copy of USA Today, I noticed that the evening hotel staff had been very busy sliding ads under my door. Today seemed to be a banner day for ads. Usually, at a conference you get one or two a day. The first two days at the conference, I received at least ten. Today, it looked like fifty. As I reached for the paper, I began to get upset over the waste of paper, time and energy. The marketing people must think this is great idea. This time, I refused to pick up the ads. In fact, I decided to aggressively move them to the side with my foot. The combination of the Grey tile and the slickness of the ads formed the perfect surface for my foot to slide out from under me. As my head hit the floor, all I could see was a bright red ad lying next to me. I snatched the ad. I held it up in front of me. As my tight grip began to curl the sides, I saw the word, “agile”. Looking closer, I read “IT wants to be Agile”. I said to myself, I need to be more agile.

Tearing the ad in shreds, I mumbled that in all my years in IT, no IT person has ever, ever, said they needed to be more agile. Agile was a marketing term not an IT term. I am in marketing and right now I hate marketing people. I put the shards in the trash and finished the rest of my morning as every other day had gone.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in BPM, Blogroll, Enterprise 2.0, Office 2.0, SOA, Web 2.0 | Leave a Comment »